Richmond – Set Up For A Fall?

Over the years, I’ve written a lot about Richmond Raceway, my home track and the place where I saw my first automobile race 60 years ago next April. The place means a lot to me.

When the track celebrated its 75th anniversary last year (the first race on the predecessor dirt track having been run in 1946), I noted the other anniversaries that could be noted; here are just a few:

1948 – First NASCAR race

1953 – First Grand National/Cup race

1968 – First race on pavement

1988 – First race on the ¾-mile track

2006 – 100th GN/Cup race

The paved half-mile Richmond track, which hosted 40 GN/Cup races.

For the record, by my counting-on-my-fingers computations, there have now been nearly 130 GN/Cup events at what was once the Atlantic Rural Exposition Fairgrounds track and – several names later – is known as Richmond Raceway.

It pains me to say that we may be about to mark another anniversary. I hope it doesn’t happen, but I fear that after this year, we may be saying:

2022 – Last season for two Cup events per year

Sad but true, we could be about to end a streak of 64 straight seasons of two races per year at Richmond, on the fairgrounds half-mile dirt track (1959-68), the half-mile paved track (’68-88), and three-quarter-mile paved track (’88-2022).

(BIG Clarification: Only one race was run in 2020, but that was due to COVID-19, when State of Virginia restrictions made it impossible to run the spring race.)

Paul Sawyer (left) during Richmond Raceway’s construction in 1988.

(Other Clarifications and Semi-Useless Information: Single races were run in 1953 and ’55-58 at the fairgrounds. Also, Southside Speedway in Richmond ran a total of four GN races in the period 1961-63. Both tracks ran events for the old Convertible or Short Track Divisions, which used similar if not identical cars – except for absent roofs with the former class.)

This isn’t Chicken Little screaming “The sky is falling.” Look at the schedule.

Except for those tracks that lost a race date, nobody got crapped on in the 2022 schedule shuffle as badly as Richmond, and there’s no way to interpret that as anything other than a move toward pulling a race date from the track.

Richmond’s spring race, scheduled for this weekend, has its earliest date since 1997, hardly a sign NASCAR wants the race to succeed. Current forecasts are for the late-afternoon-starting event to possibly end after the temperatures have dipped into the 40s.

In the bad old days, Bill France regularly assigned Richmond dates in late February – sometimes the weekend after Daytona – but former owner Paul Sawyer’s success helped earn a move into May, which lasted 13 years, after which the last weekend in April was the norm. Then the date began to creep earlier. This year’s it’s April 3.

That’s bad, but not so bad as the fall date, which was the weekend after Labor Day for more than 50 years, before some minor tinkering to give the “last race before the playoffs” date to somebody else. Still, the race was in September, a good time for racing in Richmond.

This year the fall race will become the “summer” race, running August 14 with a 3:00 p.m. start. Do you understand how much worse a date that is for Richmond, Va.?

In all fairness, regardless of dates, unless the Richmond stands fill up a lot more than this, the track doesn’t have the brightest of futures.

NASCAR gave Rockingham February and November dates to kill it off, then tried the same with Darlington, an effort that failed, fortunately. Is Richmond getting the same treatment?

It may well be a coincidence that Richmond Raceway President Dennis Bickmeier just took a job with the new Henrick County authority developing a sports complex – including a major-league indoor arena – on the site of a failed shopping mall. They got a great guy, from what I can see, but the future of his current job can’t help but have been in mind when Bickmeier entertained this offer.

If attendance flags at these two less desirable dates in 2022, will there be two dates for Richmond on the 2023 NASCAR schedule, or will mid-August be a good time for a Chicago street race?

I can’t tell you how much I hope I’m wrong about this one.

(PHOTO CREDITS – Cover photo credited to Charlotte Observer. 1970s Richmond shot is claimed by RacingOne and Getty Images in various online locations. Paul Sawyer photo is from The final nearly-empty stands photo is credited to Barry Albert for

Frank Buhrman


  1. Frank, I hope you are wrong but my read of the tea leaves is like yours (wadded up paper tossed in the trash can). The Sanctioning Body can’t wait to get on a street course, everything points at Chicago, it will probably be a NASCAR event so the date will come from a NASCAR track. Unfortunately, Richmond is the most vulnerable at this point.

    I’m hoping the racing will be good this weekend and the momentum this season has will carry over for a good crowd turnout. May not be enough but it sure can’t hurt.

    Personally, I’m looking forward to both Richmond’s especially the second one as I think the race to get into the Playoffs will be much better than has been shown in the Playoffs.

    Great assessment. Just hope your prediction is wrong.

    1. I heard/read somewhere that the Chicago track will be going away and like you, I think they will have a street course there eventually. I just cannot imagine Cup cars racing of streets but it may be good. I would hate to lose Richmond as it is one of my favorite tracks.
      The Cup racing has been better this year – maybe not much – but some.

      1. Good appreciation of Dennis Bickmeier by Randy Hallman in today’s Richmond Times-Dispatch if you can get to it to read. Another thought: NASCAR heard fans call for more short-teack races, but is NASCAR worried that all those tracks are in the same general area? I’ll bet an upgrade-able short track in California or even New York would be as much of a threat to Richmond as the streets of Chicago.

  2. If at track attendance figures in the stay or leave decision, I’m afraid the half empty Richmond grandstands didn’t send a good image. This on top of the removal of 62,000 seats doesn’t bode well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.